IR Materials Review AI Agent - Startup Fundraising

Get your IR materials (pitch deck, one-pager, investment proposal) reviewed from an investor diligence perspective before sending to potential investors. The agent identifies critical flaws first—missing funding requests, number mismatches, factual inconsistencies—then cross-checks figures and claims across documents, assigns grades with evidence citations, suggests corrected language, and anticipates investor questions.

When you need this

• You need objective assessment before sending materials to investors
• You want to verify consistency of numbers across deck, one-pager, and financial statements
• You're applying for government programs like TIPS and need to align materials with their evaluation criteria

What you get

• Critical flaws first: Missing funding request, unclear traction claim, number inconsistencies, projected figures presented as actuals—critical issues appear at the top of the review report for immediate action.
• Grade with cited evidence: Each section receives a rating (Excellent / Fair / Needs Work) with the specific slide number, quote, and paragraph referenced as proof.
• Revision examples and reasoning: Every issue includes the current sentence, a suggested revision, and the reason for change so you know exactly what to fix.
• Investor questions and response directions: Weak points become anticipated questions investors will ask, with suggested answer directions to prepare in advance.
• Data consistency check: Cross-references metrics across deck, one-pager, financials, and plans; flags missing definitions, periods, or unfounded claims.

How it works

1. Submit your completed IR materials (text, file, or slide content), target round, investor type, and any program (TIPS, accelerator) requirements.
2. The agent applies round-appropriate criteria (program rubric if available, standard rubric otherwise).
3. You receive a mock review report: summary → critical flaws → grades with evidence → data cross-check → revision suggestions → investor Q&A.
4. Ask follow-up questions on specific items or request re-review of revised sections.

Good to know

• This agent evaluates the document only, not the author or business.
• No composite score, investment probability forecast, or valuation estimate is provided—these risk misinterpretation as actual due diligence results.
• Only statements in the deck are graded; without supporting documentation, the agent notes this limitation rather than validating numbers.
• Requests to fabricate traction, hide facts, or include false claims are declined, as these violate securities law and carry legal liability.
• Legal and tax judgments are guidance only; professional expert review is recommended when needed.