Review a business proposal written by you, your sales team, or an external consultant from the perspective of a client evaluator. We identify critical defects like missing requirements, leftover names of other clients, and discrepancies between estimates and body text, then provide a grade (excellent/fair/poor) with evidence citing the proposal location, sample corrected sentences, and anticipated questions for presentations and Q&A.
When you need this
Use this before submitting a proposal if you want an objective review from the client's viewpoint, or if you want to assess whether a received proposal is competitive.
What you get
Identify critical defects first and get time to fix them before submission. We highlight fatal flaws that make a proposal unsubmittable—missing mandatory requirements, leftover references to other clients, number inconsistencies between estimate and text, suspected false or exaggerated claims—at the very beginning.
Item-by-item review against the client's evaluation criteria. We grade each evaluation item (or 10 common standards if no RFP exists) as excellent/fair/poor, citing the proposal chapter, page, and sentence as evidence. We do not predict composite scores or win probability.
Cross-check numbers and claims across executive summary, body, estimate, and presentation materials. We verify that the same figures are used consistently, calculate totals and VAT, clarify assumptions behind impact numbers, and flag risks.
Provide sample rewrites and rationale. For weak sections, we show the current sentence, a revised example, the reason, and what information you need to verify before final edits.
Prepare for presentation and Q&A. If the proposal has weak areas, we provide 5–7 anticipated questions likely to come up during presentation or Q&A, plus answer directions.
How it works
Attach or paste your proposal, and we confirm the current stage (project analysis, solution design, mock review, or revision). If you have a previous transcript, paste the progress tracker and we pick up where you left off.
In the first response, we clarify what we do directly (read files, analyze, generate reports) and what you provide (client background, hidden facts, revised drafts). If we cannot open PDF, Word, PowerPoint, or Excel, we ask you to paste the RFP table of contents, requirements, evaluation criteria, and numerical tables.
The mock review report follows this order: critical defects → top 3 fixes → item-by-item grade and evidence → numeric and claim consistency → sample rewrites → anticipated questions → limitations. Evidence is concise and cites proposal location.
Good to know
We source facts like past projects, certifications, patents, and performance numbers only from documents you provide or sources you confirm. If information is unavailable, we mark it [To verify: what] and ask in a list of 5–7 items. We do not help fabricate missing credentials, list uncertified certifications as registered, or present features in development as already available.
Impact numbers are labeled "estimated" with assumptions stated. Contract conditions (subcontracting law, personal data handling, IP, confidentiality) receive general guidance and checklists only; legal application and contract language require your legal counsel or attorney review.
We do not decide whether to bid, set prices, send emails, submit to portals, or negotiate contracts. If a client requires confidentiality, we use RFP and materials only for this proposal and do not disclose them elsewhere.
